Popular Posts

Saturday, November 30, 2013

The Root Warrior- “ROOT BY SHAKESPEARE “



The Root Warrior
“ROOT BY SHAKESPEARE
THE ROOT ARCHERY DIVISION OF THE 
SHAKESPEARE COMPANY

by Larry Vienneau
 
a 1964 example of a Root Warrior Recurve
William Shakespeare Jr. invented a patent for his fishing reel and began producing fishing equipment in the late 1800s. During the 20th century, Shakespeare became a major producer of sporting equipment. In 1959 Shakespeare Cooperation acquired Parabow, the Ohio-based Parallel Plastics Company, a maker of archery equipment that later was organized into Shakespeare's Archery subsidiary.  In early 1959 Shakespeare began a collaboration with a gifted bow maker Ernie Root and they introduced their first fiberglass and wood laminated bows, Model 100 - 600.                See post: http://shakespearearchery.blogspot.com/2013/08/early-shakespeare-bows-model-100-model.html

With Mr. Root's vision and expertise, Shakespeare created outstanding and affordable bows. During the 1960’s Ernie Root also maintained his own line of archery equipment. Root Archery started as a family business in suburban Chicago. After outgrowing a couple of small spaces it moves out of the city, eventually settling in Big Rapids, MI. Most people assumed that Shakespeare acquired Root Archery in the late 1960s. Ernie Root’s Son Lawrence Root has been adding to the knowledge and now it seems that it was more of a mutually beneficial merger rather than an acquisition.  Root Archery had been a supplier to Shakespeare for several years. Around the late 60's he sold a number of his designs to Shakespeare, who trimmed them down and renamed them. For example, The Root Warrior became the Necedah in 1964 as a 55” bow, and The Brush Master became the Kaibab, and the Field Master became the Ocala. The first bows of this type bore the name "ROOT BY SHAKESPEARE ". In truth Shakespeare should have labeled all of their bows~ “SHAKESPEARE BY ROOT” since Ernie Root was the driving creative and technical force behind the Archery division. Around 1968-69 Shakespeare bought the Root factories and production facilities, and it was known as “The Root Archery Division of the Shakespeare Company”. The “Root” name was dropped completely at the end of 1969 but Ernie Roots' design influence would continue and Mr. Root became consultant and manager production. Shakespeare Archery Division moved to Columbia, SC in 1972-73 a move Mr. Root opposed. Ernie Root remained in Big Rapids and he continued to build bows. Shakespeare faltered due to the poor management and their unwillingness to embrace the compound bow. Shakespeare closed its Archery division in 1976.  


Joe Zoppa's Root Warrior
The 58” Root Warrior was first introduced in 1964, the same year that Shakespeare introduced 55” The Necedah. The two bows are indistinguishable right down to the red feather rest. The Necedah eventually became a 58” bow in 1965.  The 1968 “Root by Shakespeare” Warrior at 58” and the 1968 Shakespeare Necedah 54” were very similar bows with different woods and AMO. In fact, the Root Warrior’s profile can be found in many of the Shakespeare Bows. 


Root Warrior 1964-70.” Root by Shakespeare” Warrior x100, 1968

  • 58” AMO
  • Weights 35- 60 lbs.
  • Dark Brown Fiberglass
  • Riser wood: Imbuya Wood
  • Sight window:  5 1/2 inches center shot.
  • Brace height: 8 inches
  •  1 3/4(before 1968) and 2-inch-wide limb
  • Imbuya and maple overlay
  • Red feather arrow rest, calf hair, or leather strike plate
  • arrow speed 12 shots avg. 410-grain arrow- 180.46 FPS
My left hand 45# Warrior Root by Shakespeare X100
My Warrior needed work on the riser. During its lifetime it may have been placed unprotected into the back of a pickup and taken down a rough road. Ironically the limbs and tip overlays were in excellent condition. The limbs were perfectly straight.

Since the Root Warrior, The Necedah, and Super Necedah share so many traits and lineage, I think comparing these bows is necessary.
Arrow speed- 12 shot average with 410 gr arrow

45 lb. Root Warrior x100 58" --180.45 FPS

38 lb. Super Necedah X30 ----169.11 FPS

52 lb. Super Necedah X30---- 182.90 FPS 
50 lb. Super Necedah x32------184.09 FPS

55 lb. Necedah 55” X26-------- 187.74 FPS

45 lb. Necedah 58"X26--------- 184.66 FPS

This summer I did a performance comparison of all of my 27 hunting bows. I shot Bear, Hoyt, Ben Pearson, Wing, Root, Samick recurve, and Shakespeare bows as well as four horse bows, two homemade sinew-backed bows, and three homemade longbows

The Necedah bow did very well, the 55” 55 lb. Necedah X26 finished 4th overall and the 58” 45lb. Necedah X26 finished 6th. I only tested my 52lb. Super Necedah x30 and it finished 14th, in the middle of the pack. My Warrior arrived in September and I only shot one 300-round  with it, it finished in the top 1/3 of shooters so I can’t compare the score yet but my gut feeling is it will shoot more consistently than the Super Necedah because of the longer limbs.

I had the chance to shoot the 45 lb. 58” Necedah X26 with the 45 lb. 58” Warrior on a 3D target course. After a day of shooting I think I have a near tie with the advantage going to the Warrior (I didn’t lose one arrow). The bow is a very smooth shooter, with very little hand shock and very little noise, unlike my Super Necedah X30 which is a loud bow.  I think it outshot my Necedah on several of the longer 35-40 yard shots due to its center shot construction. 
Root by Shakespeare Warrior x100 at the range

The Warrior is another fine example of the beauty and expertise of Ernie Root's design. Ernie Root was a tournament champion; his bows met a high standard of performance. Many Bear and Hoyt enthusiasts might be shocked to learn that Shakespeare and Root bows finished with 6 of the top 10 finishes in my “competition” and 3 of the top 5. After two more 300 rounds with the Warrior, I will have to rewrite the article. With a few tweaks to the tuning, I am confident this bow could surpass the Necedah.




© Copyright, Larry Vienneau Jr.
All rights reserved.

4 comments:

  1. An ad in september 1969 archery world magazine talks of 10 Root bow models that year. I would like to know which ten models where in production. Anderson Archery was a distributor of Root products and there 68, 69, and 70 catalogs should tell what was avaliable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. that is a good question. It is hard find to catalogs and printed material about Root archery. Most of what I have learned is shared information or discussions on archery forums. I didn't know that Anderson was that involved with Root. I will do some searching. Do you think you could send me that 1969 ad? shakespeare.archer@aol.com

      Delete
  2. Hello, just came into possession of a Root Warrior that should be an easy restoration. Question, though: it has what looks to be a 1968 serial, but the handle has the shape of your 1964 Warrior picture above. Any ideas on this?

    Thanks for your pages here!

    Scott

    ReplyDelete